San Francisco property owners
What your San Francisco building is worth, and what your options are.
A confidential review of your property, an estimated market value, and the practical options in front of you. You decide what, if anything, comes next.
Since 1970 · San Francisco
The property review
Three things you get back
You hear back from Jackson directly, usually within one business day.
-
Where your rents sit against the market
Where you can share a rent roll, we go through it unit by unit and compare it with current asking and achieved rents nearby. You see where each unit sits and how that shapes the building's value.
-
An estimated value range
A preliminary broker opinion of value and market analysis, based on income, condition, and comparable rents and sales. It is a range, not an appraisal.
-
The options actually in front of you
Leasing, management, improvements, or a sale, each laid out with what it would likely mean for income and value, and the estimated timing. You decide how we can help, on your own timeline.
Request your property review
Every submission gets a personal response, typically within one business day. Requesting a review changes nothing at the property. No sign, no listing, and no one contacts your tenants.
Property Review Request
Confidential · Complimentary · Takes about a minute
Request received
Thank you. We’ll review your property details and reach out, typically within one business day.
Jackson
AMSI · leasing · management
NOVO · real estate sales
San Francisco multifamily
What we are seeing in the market
San Francisco’s rental market tightened over the past year: citywide multifamily vacancy fell to 3.2% from 3.9%, and rents rose 13.3%, the highest annual rate in ten years, according to CoStar.
On the sales side, buyers price buildings on a sliding scale by size. Medians from 694 closed income-property sales on the SFAR MLS over the past twelve months:
| Building size Size | Sales | Per unit | Per sq ft PSF | GRM | Cap rate Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 to 4 units | 491 | $762,500 | $638 | 15.1x | 4.8% |
| 5 to 15 units | 168 | $382,800 | $450 | 11.9x | 5.7% |
| 16+ units | 31 | $234,000 | $339 | 9.8x | 6.4% |
More from the September report
Rent growth was positive in every city submarket CoStar tracks, led by South of Market at 25.7% and Mission Bay at 23.3%. The slowest, Marina and Pacific Heights, was up 4.5%. CoStar counts 918 units delivered over the past year and 1,740 under construction, under 1% of the city’s stock.
In Zumper’s September listing data, the median listed rent across all rental types was $4,495, with 642 active listings. The median one-bedroom listing was $4,275, up 19% year over year, and the median two-bedroom was $6,200, up 22%.
CoStar reports $2.1 billion of multifamily property traded in the city over the past twelve months, with price per unit up 7.1%. In the MLS sales data, small buildings drew the most competition: 59% of two to four unit sales closed over asking, compared with 36% for five to fifteen units and 19% for sixteen or more. Per-unit prices on small buildings rose from $730,000 in the first half of the period to $800,000 in the second, as cap rates compressed about half a point.
Location moves the number as much as size. Small buildings in the Marina, Cow Hollow, and Pacific Heights sold for a median $1.30 million per unit and $964 per square foot at a 4.0% cap rate. In the Mission, Bernal Heights, Potrero, and SoMa, the medians were $579,000, $545, and 5.9%. The Richmond and Lake District was the most active small-building market, with 113 sales. Nineteen of the 31 sixteen-plus unit sales were in Nob Hill, Russian Hill, and North Beach, at a median $199,000 per unit and a 7.2% cap rate.
Each figure is a market-wide median. A specific building lands above or below it based on its rent roll, tenancies, condition, and lot. The full September report is available as a PDF, and owners can request a complimentary preliminary broker opinion of value and market analysis.
Sources: CoStar Group, City of San Francisco multifamily analytics and San Francisco Multi-Family Market Report (city submarkets), September 2026, licensed to Novo Real Estate. Sales data based on information from the San Francisco Association of REALTORS MLS as of September 22, 2026; 694 closed Residential Income sales, city of San Francisco, 10/1/2025 to 9/22/2026; not guaranteed. Zumper Rent Research, San Francisco, September 2026, medians of active listings, all rental types. Rent multiple and cap rate use income reported on the listing.
For San Francisco owners
Rent control and property value
For many San Francisco apartment buildings, value begins with the rent roll.
Most rental units in buildings constructed before June 13, 1979 are subject to the city’s rent-control provisions. During an existing tenancy, rent increases are generally limited by the Rent Ordinance. When a lawful vacancy occurs, an owner can generally establish a new initial rent, subject to applicable exceptions.
Over time, that creates a rent roll where each unit can tell a different story. One may be near current market rent while another, occupied by the same tenant for many years, may be substantially below it.
Buyers price that difference.
They look first at the income the property produces today, then at the relationship between in-place rents and current market rents. That is why two otherwise similar buildings on the same block can have materially different values.
Unused allowable increases may also be relevant. San Francisco permits certain annual increases to be banked, but applying a banked increase involves specific eligibility, notice, timing, reporting, and licensing requirements. It should be reviewed tenancy by tenancy rather than treated as automatic.
Our property review starts with the rent roll. We compare each unit with current market rents, examine the building’s existing income, and identify where rent differences may affect valuation.
For questions involving a particular tenancy, rent increase, exemption, or obligation under the Rent Ordinance, we recommend consulting qualified legal counsel. Our role is to show how the building’s income and tenancy profile are likely to be viewed in the market.
Selling a building with tenants in place
An occupied building can be sold. In fact, much of San Francisco’s multifamily market consists of properties with existing tenants.
The tenancy does not disappear when ownership changes, so buyers spend considerable time understanding the rent roll and the rights and obligations attached to each unit.
That typically means reviewing leases, rent histories, tenant records, estoppel certificates when appropriate, operating expenses, service contracts, permits, improvements, and maintenance history.
Good records matter. A buyer who can understand the property quickly has fewer unknowns to price into the transaction.
The tenancy profile matters as well. Long-term and below-market tenancies can influence both current income and a buyer’s view of future income, so they need to be reflected accurately in the valuation rather than treated as a simple adjustment.
Not every sale needs a large public campaign. Depending on the property and the owner’s objectives, a process can range from broad market exposure to targeted outreach to a limited group of qualified buyers.
Preparation does not necessarily mean renovation.
Sometimes the best approach is to address obvious maintenance or safety issues and present the building cleanly. Other times, major improvements are better left to the next owner. An investor may prefer to control the renovation, choose the scope, and capture the opportunity themselves.
The question is whether the work is likely to create more value than it costs or simply make the property easier to sell.
In some cases, the smarter preparation is simply to organize the records, understand the deferred maintenance, obtain estimates where useful, and make sure buyers can clearly see both the property as it stands today and the opportunity ahead.
If you have inherited a building
An inherited San Francisco property often comes with more than real estate.
There may be long-term tenants, decades of maintenance history, deferred decisions, incomplete records, and several family members with different ideas about what should happen next.
The first step is understanding what you own.
What does the building earn today? What are the units renting for compared with the current market? What does it cost to operate? What work is likely ahead? And what might the property be worth in its present condition?
Once those questions are answered, the options become easier to compare.
That may mean leasing vacant units, improving the building’s income or presentation, or preparing it for a sale. Where ongoing management is part of the plan, AMSI can handle that as well.
Inherited property can also involve important tax, estate, trust, probate, and title considerations. Those questions belong with the appropriate CPA and legal advisors.
Our role is on the real estate side: establish the income picture, analyze the market, develop a value range, and help you understand how the property is likely to be viewed by buyers.
When several people have a stake in the decision, having the same facts on the table can make the conversation considerably easier. We are happy to walk through the review with everyone involved, together.
How San Francisco apartment buildings are valued
There is rarely one number that determines what an apartment building is worth.
Buyers typically look at the property from several angles.
The income approach examines what the building earns. Gross income can be expressed through a gross rent multiplier, or GRM. Net operating income can be compared with price through a capitalization rate, or cap rate.
The sales comparison approach looks at what comparable properties have actually sold for, including price per unit, price per square foot, location, condition, unit mix, and tenancy profile.
The importance of each measure changes with the property.
Two-to-four-unit buildings can attract both investors and owner-occupants, so comparable sales and the residential characteristics of the property may carry considerable weight.
Larger apartment buildings tend to be evaluated more directly as income-producing investments. Buyers focus closely on NOI, cap rate, rent levels, operating expenses, and the potential risks and opportunities within the rent roll.
A preliminary broker opinion of value brings those perspectives together.
We analyze the building’s income and expenses, compare it with relevant closed sales and competing properties, and develop a value range supported by the market rather than a single metric.
What actually moves the number
For an income-producing building, the rent roll is one of the most important pieces of the valuation.
But it is not the only one.
Buyers also consider operating expenses, vacancies, unit mix, building condition, deferred maintenance, capital improvements, seismic work, permits, location, financing conditions, and the depth of the buyer pool.
Some of those factors are outside an owner’s control.
Others are not.
Accurate records, a well-understood rent roll, and thoughtful property preparation can make a meaningful difference in how buyers evaluate a property.
Thoughtful preparation does not always mean spending money. Sometimes improving a property before sale creates value. Sometimes the opportunity itself is part of what attracts the buyer.
Knowing the difference is part of the strategy.
A property review can be useful simply to understand where you stand today, what may be affecting value, and how the property could be positioned for the market.
Where we work
AMSI has served San Francisco since 1970 and today operates from Van Ness Avenue.
Through AMSI and NOVO Real Estate, we work with owners across San Francisco on property management, leasing, investment sales, and real estate strategy.
We also own property ourselves, so we look at buildings from more than one perspective. That helps us understand how a property performs today, where value may be created, and how to position it when the time comes to sell.
Our work spans neighborhoods throughout the city, including Russian Hill, Nob Hill, Pacific Heights, Cow Hollow, the Marina, North Beach, the Mission, the Castro, Hayes Valley, Potrero Hill, Bernal Heights, the Richmond, and the Sunset, as well as mixed-use and commercial properties throughout San Francisco.
We also work with owners and investors elsewhere in the Bay Area.
The market changes from neighborhood to neighborhood and property to property. The starting point is the same: understand the asset, understand the income, and understand how today’s buyers are likely to value it.
AMSI • Novo Real Estate
San Francisco owned and operated since 1970.
AMSI has leased and managed San Francisco property since 1970, and Novo Real Estate is the firm’s sales division. Because we operate buildings as well as sell them, a review from us reflects how a property actually performs day to day. If the right answer is to hold the building or to lease it rather than sell, we will say so.
The firm works across multifamily and mixed-use buildings, retail and office space, development sites, and corporate housing, in San Francisco and across the Bay Area. Investment sales, leasing, and property management sit under one roof, so you can get a straight answer about any of them without being handed to someone else.
You work directly with the person handling your property, backed by a firm with 55+ years in San Francisco.
Jackson Salamunovich · Commercial and Multifamily · Novo Real Estate, the sales division of AMSI · CA DRE #02200078
Property reviews are broker opinions of value provided for informational purposes only and are not appraisals. Market conditions change; no particular outcome, income, or increase in value is guaranteed. Information is deemed reliable but subject to verification. Nothing on this page is legal, tax, or investment advice.


